Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
47
Highlights
33
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
beyerdynamic M 160
vs
Royer 121:
47 Highlights & 33 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Simple tech comparison with practical details. Perfect if you want to know what makes each mic special.
Trying to decide between beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121? This microphones face-off covers tone, controls, design, and key connection interface, power source, onboard controls & stand/tripod that musicians care about.
Ribbon Microphone Face-Off: beyerdynamic M 160 Versus Royer 121
When it comes to professional ribbon microphones, the beyerdynamic M 160 and the Royer 121 stand as iconic contenders, each tailored for precision sound capture in the studio and beyond. Both mics feature high-quality ribbon elements and are designed primarily for studio and instrument recording, sharing passive operation that eschews batteries and external power sources. Fundamentally, the M 160 employs a hypercardioid polar pattern which sharpens its directional pickup, making it ideal for isolating sound sources, including broadcast scenarios, while the Royer 121's figure-8 pattern excels at stereo and ambient capture by embracing sound from two opposite directions. These design choices influence their form factor as well: the compact handheld M 160 with a sturdier neodymium magnet contrasts with the taller, side-address Royer 121 equipped with a swivel/pivot mount for flexible positioning. Their connectivity differs too, with the beyerdynamic favoring a detachable cable versus the Royer's permanently attached cable, impacting on-the-fly usability. Lastly, pricing separates them quite starkly, with the M 160 standing as a more affordable powerhouse and the Royer 121 demanding a premium for its specialized design and versatility.
Compact Precision With beyerdynamic M 160
The beyerdynamic M 160 truly shines as a versatile ribbon mic favored by professionals who need pinpoint focus combined with the convenience of a hand-held form. Its defining hypercardioid pattern allows for excellent rejection of off-axis noise; a fantastic trait for isolating individual instruments or voices in complex mixes. Coupled with its 1.5-inch capsule diameter, it offers a warm yet detailed capture that studio and broadcast users crave. The presence of a neodymium magnet provides a robust magnetic field that enhances sensitivity and sonic clarity without sacrificing ruggedness. The microphone's thoughtful design extends to a detachable cable system that dramatically improves serviceability and reduces downtime, a practical edge especially for touring or busy recording sessions. Additionally, the M 160 includes a two-year warranty and is compliant with safety and environmental standards, reassuring users of its quality and reliability. Although it lacks onboard controls and proximity effect management; typical for ribbon microphones; the M 160's streamlined, maintenance-friendly design and comparatively affordable price point (available for around $949.99 at beyerdynamic) make it a smart choice for professionals.
Classic Stereo Flexibility with Royer 121
The Royer 121 takes a different approach with its figure-8 polar pattern, making it a go-to for audio engineers seeking lush stereo imaging and natural room ambiance. Its side-address form allows for comfortable placement in stereo rigs or XY configurations, helping to capture spatial characteristics effectively. Measuring slightly taller at 7.25 inches with a 1-inch capsule, it's compact enough for most setups but noticeably larger than the M 160. The Royer also has a lower minimum terminating impedance of 300 Ω, which can interact well with a variety of preamps to produce a signature ribbon tonality. Ergonomics is another point in the Royer's favor: its swivel/pivot mount allows swift angle adjustments without needing to reposition stands, ideal for dynamic studio environments. Royer packages the mic with a variety of mounting adapters, enhancing versatility. On the downside, the permanently attached cable slightly limits quick cable swaps, and its significantly higher cost (about $1599 at Amazon) means it's really an investment for those prioritizing stereo figure-8 capture and ergonomic flexibility.
Quick Take
The beyerdynamic M 160 boasts a hypercardioid pattern with a detachable cable and neodymium magnet, balancing directional accuracy with user-friendly maintenance and a moderate price tag. Meanwhile, the Royer 121 stands out with its figure-8 polar pattern tailored for immersive stereo recording, a swivel mount for ergonomic positioning, and additional mounting accessories; though these come at a substantial premium.
Bottom Line
Choosing between these two iconic ribbon mics depends on your recording needs: the beyerdynamic M 160 is an excellent pick for those seeking reliability, directional precision, and affordability in a compact design. In contrast, the Royer 121 is perfect for engineers who prioritize stereo recording flexibility and ergonomic mounting capabilities and are willing to invest more for those features.
Verdict
Winner: beyerdynamic M 160 - Offers superb directional control, detachable cables for easy maintenance, and excellent value for money at under $1000.
Runner-up: Royer 121 - Best suited for stereo figure-8 applications and studio setups that benefit from ergonomic swivel mounting, despite a higher price and fixed cable.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We stacked every sound, control, and tech detail between beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121. This side-by-side microphones review highlights what really matters — and what might surprise you.
The Polar Pattern Type differs between beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121. The M 160 uses a Hypercardioid pattern, ideal for focused sound capture, while the Royer 121 uses a Figure-8 pattern, better for rejecting side noise. Choose M 160 for isolated sources, Royer 121 for ambient sound.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Royer 121 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I really like how the M 160's hypercardioid pattern focuses on the sound source better than the Royer 121's figure-8. It helps cut out background noise in busy setups.
Form Factor varies as beyerdynamic M 160 is Handheld, suitable for mobile or live use, whereas Royer 121 is Side-Address, generally preferred in studio setups. For handheld versatility, go with M 160; for fixed studio mounts, Royer 121 is more suited.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Form Factor,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Royer 121 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
60
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Studio, Instrument, Broadcast
53
Royer 121
0Votes
Studio, Instrument
vs
Intended Use
In Intended Use, beyerdynamic M 160 supports Studio, Instrument, and Broadcast applications, showing versatility. Royer 121 is intended mainly for Studio and Instrument usage. For broadcast needs, M 160 aligns better; otherwise, both fit studio and instrument recording.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level for beyerdynamic M 160 is Professional only, indicating advanced users. Royer 121 suits both Intermediate and Professional users, making it more accessible. Choose Royer 121 for broader skill compatibility; M 160 is tailored for pros.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
50
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Ribbon, Dynamic
43
Royer 121
0Votes
Ribbon
Royer 121
This is a Ribbon microphone, meaning it uses a thin metal ribbon element that typically produces a smooth high-frequency roll-off and natural mids.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
50
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
M 160
53
Royer 121
0Votes
R-121
Royer 121
Model name is R-121, Royer's well-known ribbon microphone commonly used in professional studios.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
0
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
1957
28
Royer 121
0Votes
1991
Royer 121
Year of release is 1991, indicating this design has a long track record in professional use.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
45
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
M Series
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
75
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Germany
78
Royer 121
0Votes
United States
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
38
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Mixer, PC, Mac, AudioInterface
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Lists supported platforms and devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
20
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Wired, XLR
43
Royer 121
0Votes
Wired, XLR
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
35
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Black
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Available product colors.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
38
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Stand, Boom Arm, Clip
33
Royer 121
0Votes
Stand
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
85
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Unisex
93
Royer 121
0Votes
Unisex
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
65
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Professional, Adult
68
Royer 121
0Votes
Adult, Professional
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Application Category
What recording applications is it best for?
38
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Studio, Instrument, Broadcast
65
Royer 121
0Votes
Studio, Broadcast, Field Recording
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
85
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Global
93
Royer 121
0Votes
Global
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Limited Edition
Limited Edition status for beyerdynamic M 160 is 'No' whereas Royer 121's value is unavailable (n/a). Since neither is a limited edition, this does not impact preference significantly for either.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter is 1.5 inches for beyerdynamic M 160 versus 1 inch for Royer 121, indicating a larger capsule in M 160 which can impact sound pickup characteristics. M 160's larger capsule usually means richer tone capture.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
In the battle of Capsule Diameter,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.5 inch
measurement.
Based on community votes for Capsule Diameter,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Royer 121 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Capsule diameter matters and the M 160's 1.5 inch one gives it a richer tone than the Royer's smaller 1 inch capsule. That thickness adds warmth to recordings.
Height differs with beyerdynamic M 160 at 6.1 inches and Royer 121 at 7.25 inches, making the Royer taller by 1.15 inches. For space-limited setups, M 160 is more compact; Royer offers a larger form potentially suited for detailed acoustic capture.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.2 inch
measurement.
Based on community votes for Height,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Royer 121 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Width
Package Width is not available for beyerdynamic M 160, but Royer 121 measures 10 inches. Lack of width info for M 160 limits direct comparison; Royer 121's width might influence packaging preference.
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
6.13
inch
0Votes
vs
Capsule Length
Capsule Length of M 160 is unavailable, whereas Royer 121's capsule length is 6.13 inches. Knowing Royer 121's capsule length helps in precise setup and compatibility with rigs compared to unknown M 160 specs.
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
4
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Depth
Package Depth is unavailable for beyerdynamic M 160, while Royer 121 has a 4-inch depth. This may affect shipping or storage needs where space is a consideration with the Royer model.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
1.5
inch
0Votes
2
inch
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
That’s about 3.8 cm, roughly the diameter of a golf ball.
Royer 121
Body width is 2 inch (5.08 cm), giving the microphone a narrow profile that aids in close-miking and placement.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
0.34
lbs
0Votes
0.53
lbs
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
About 154 g, as light as a deck of cards — very light for a ribbon mic.
Royer 121
Weight is 0.53 lbs, which converts to 0.24 kg.
At this light weight the microphone is easy to position and places minimal stress on stands and mounts.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
1.5
inch
0Votes
2
inch
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Roughly 3.8 cm, small and focused to reduce off-axis coloration.
Royer 121
Grill diameter measures 2 inch (approximately 5.08 cm), contributing to the microphone's protective coverage.
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
In the battle of Grill Diameter,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2
inch
0Votes
Royer 121
Depth is 2 inch (approximately 5.08 cm), indicating a compact form factor for easy mounting.
The microphone’s overall depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2
inch
0Votes
Royer 121
Base footprint diameter is 2 inch (5.08 cm), which helps determine clearance on stands or mounts.
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
4
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
65
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
3/8"
68
Royer 121
0Votes
3/8"
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Performance
29
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
40
Hz
0Votes
30
Hz
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Captures deep bass down to 40 Hz, enough for drums, guitars, and lower brass, but won’t fully cover sub-bass rumble.
Royer 121
Low frequency response extends down to 30 Hz, allowing the mic to capture deep fundamentals in many sources.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
10.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
18,000
Hz
0Votes
15,000
Hz
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Extends up to 18 kHz, giving clear detail for cymbals and strings without harsh brightness.
Royer 121
High frequency response reaches up to 15000 Hz.
Together with the minimum value this yields a nominal range of 30 Hz to 15000 Hz, characteristic of classic ribbon tonality.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
3,000.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-60
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-53
dBV/Pa
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Very low output, meaning it needs a high-gain preamp or inline booster (e.g., Cloudlifter) to avoid noise.
Royer 121
Sensitivity is -53 dBV/Pa, which reflects the microphone's low voltage output for a given sound pressure.
This sensitivity characteristic is normal for passive ribbon designs.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
7.0 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
1,000
Ω
0Votes
300
Ω
0Votes
vs
Minimum Terminating Impedance
Minimum Terminating Impedance is significantly different: 1000 Ω for beyerdynamic M 160 compared to 300 Ω for Royer 121. M 160 requires higher impedance, which can affect preamp compatibility, with Royer 121 more flexible for various gear.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
In the battle of Minimum Terminating Impedance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
700.0 Ω
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
200
ohm
0Votes
300
ohm
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Matches standard studio gear; prevents signal loss with long XLR runs.
Royer 121
Output impedance is 300 ohm, a typical low impedance for ribbon microphones that pairs well with modern preamps.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
100.0 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
25
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Unidirectional
28
Royer 121
0Votes
Bidirectional
Royer 121
Directionality is Bidirectional, synonymous with a figure-8 pattern and useful for techniques like Blumlein or mid-side recording.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
5
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Mono
23
Royer 121
0Votes
Mono
Royer 121
Operates in Mono as a single-capsule microphone; stereo imaging requires multiple microphones or dedicated stereo configurations.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
25
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
beyerdynamic M 160
Strong rejection at 110° — great for isolating guitar amps or instruments in a crowded studio.
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-60
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-53
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Royer 121
Output level is -53 dBV/Pa, indicating a relatively low output typical of passive ribbon microphones.
Expect to use a preamp with sufficient clean gain to achieve desired recording levels.
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
In the battle of Output Level,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
7.0 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
70
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Ribbon, Dynamic
43
Royer 121
0Votes
Ribbon
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The maximum loudness before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
55
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
63
Royer 121
0Votes
Ribbon Velocity
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
85
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Fast
93
Royer 121
0Votes
Fast
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
In the battle of Transient Response,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
vs
Proximity Effect Control
Both beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121 lack Proximity Effect Control. So, neither mic offers built-in control for bass boost when close to the source, calling for technique or external processing for handling proximity effects.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
53
Royer 121
0Votes
Stepped
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
35
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Transformer
63
Royer 121
0Votes
Transformer
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Both beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121 use XLR as the Connection Interface, ensuring professional and balanced audio connections compatible with standard recording equipment.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Detachable feature exists on beyerdynamic M 160 but not on Royer 121. The detachable cable on M 160 allows easier transport and cable replacement, making it more convenient for field use.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Cable Detachable,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Royer 121 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
30
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
63
Royer 121
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
Royer 121
Audio output options are Analog and Balanced, which allows long cable runs with reduced noise when connected to professional preamps.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
15
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Standard
43
Royer 121
0Votes
Standard
Royer 121
XLR pin configuration is Standard, ensuring compatibility with conventional balanced microphone inputs and cabling.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
85
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Balanced
63
Royer 121
0Votes
Balanced
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source for both beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121 is Passive, meaning neither needs batteries or external power supplies, reducing complexity and ensuring simplicity in operation.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither beyerdynamic M 160 nor Royer 121 has a Power Indicator Light. This means visual power status feedback is absent for both microphones in professional setups.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
vs
External Power Supply Compatibility
External Power Supply Compatibility is not available for both beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121, indicating these microphones rely on standard phantom power or passive operation without external PSU options.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control is not present on either beyerdynamic M 160 or Royer 121, implying real-time blend between mic and playback monitoring must be handled externally.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights are absent on both beyerdynamic M 160 and Royer 121, which means users won’t get visual cues about operational status directly from the microphone housing.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither beyerdynamic M 160 nor Royer 121 supports App or Software Integration, indicating these mics are traditional analog devices without smart connectivity for app-based control.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
45
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Metal
43
Royer 121
0Votes
Metal
Royer 121
Grill material is Metal, providing robust protection for the ribbon element against physical contact.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Body Material
What is the body material?
35
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Metal
43
Royer 121
0Votes
Metal
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Material on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pop Filter on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
63
Royer 121
0Votes
Foam
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Both come with a carrying case but I prefer the M 160's overall portability and design which makes it easier to carry around compared to the Royer 121.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Yes
0Votes
Royer 121
Royer 121
Spare parts are available, which supports long-term maintenance and repairability of the microphone.
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Yes
0Votes
Royer 121
Royer 121
A warranty card is provided, which simplifies registering the product and making warranty claims if necessary.
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Yes
0Votes
Royer 121
Royer 121
A protective foam insert is supplied to cushion the microphone inside its case and limit movement during transit.
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Optional Windshield Model,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Yes
0Votes
Royer 121
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
35
beyerdynamic M 160
0Votes
Box
33
Royer 121
0Votes
Box
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
better than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Yes
0Votes
Royer 121
Royer 121
RoHS compliance is affirmed, indicating the product conforms to restrictions on certain hazardous substances in its manufacture.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
Yes
0Votes
Royer 121
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
worse than
Royer 121 ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Royer 121
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
beyerdynamic M 160
No
0Votes
Royer 121
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
beyerdynamic M 160 ◉ is
same as
Royer 121 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on beyerdynamic M 160 ◉
vs Royer 121 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
